THE LIVES OF THE SAINTS
BY THE
REV. S. BARING-GOULD
THE MARTYROLOGIES
MARTYROLOGY means, properly, a list
of witnesses. The martyrologies are catalogues in which are to be found the
names of the Saints, with the days and places of their deaths, and generally
with the distinctive character of their sanctity, and with an historic summary
of their lives. The name is incorrect if we use the word "martyr" in
its restricted sense as a witness unto death. "Hagiology" would be
more suitable, as a martyrology includes the names of many Saints who were not
martyrs. But the term "Martyrology" was given to this catalogue at an
early age, when it was customary to commemorate only those who were properly martyrs,
having suffered death in testimony to their faith; but it is not unsuitable if
we regard as martyrs all those who by their lives have testified to the truth,
as indeed we are justified in doing.
In the primitive Church it was
customary for the Holy Eucharist to be celebrated on the anniversary of the
death of a martyr—if possible, on his tomb. Where in one diocese there were
several martyrs, as, for instance, in that of Caesarea, there were many days in
the year on which these commemorations were made, and the Church—say that of
Caesarea —drew up a calendar with the days marked on which these festivals
occurred.
In his "Church History,"
Eusebius quotes a letter from the Church of Smyrna, in which, after giving an
account of the martyrdom of their bishop, S. Polycarp, the disciple of S. John
the Divine, the Smyrnians observe: "Our subtle enemy, the devil, did his
utmost that we should not take away the body, as many of us anxiously wished.
It was suggested that we should desert our crucified Master, and begin to
worship Polycarp. Fools! who knew not that we can never desert Christ, who died
for the salvation of all men, nor worship any other. Him we adore as the Son of
God; but we show respect to the martyrs, as His disciples and followers. The
centurion, therefore, caused the body to be burned; we then gathered his bones,
more precious than pearls, and more tried than gold, and buried them. In this
place, God willing, we will meet, and celebrate with joy and gladness the
birthday of this martyr, as well in memory of those who have been crowned
before, as by his example to prepare and strengthen others for the
combat."
S. Polycarp suffered in the year
166; he had been ordained Bishop of Smyrna by S. John in 96. This passage is
extremely interesting, for it shows us, in the age following that of the
apostles, the Church already keeping the festivals of martyrs, and, as we may
conclude from the words of the letter, over the tombs of the martyrs. In this
the Church was following the pattern shown to S. John in vision; for he heard
the cry of the souls of the martyrs reposing under the altar in heaven. Guided,
doubtless, by this, the Church erected altars over the bodies of saints. Among
the early Christian writers there are two, S. Paulinus of Nola, and Prudentius,
whose testimony is of intrinsic value, not only from its being curiously
interesting, but because it is so full and unequivocal as to the fact of the
tombs of the martyrs being used as altars. In one of his letters to Severus, S.
Paulinus encloses some verses of his own composition, which were to be
inscribed over the altar under which was deposited the body of S. Clavus, of whom
the venerable prelate says:
"His holy bones
'neath lasting altars rest."
Before describing the basilica of
Nola, the Saint proceeds to give a sketch of another but a smaller church,
which he had just erected in the town of Fondi. After furnishing some details
about this latter edifice, he says: "The sacred ashes—some of the blessed
relics of the apostles and martyrs—shall consecrate this little basilica also
in the name of Christ, the Saint of saints, the Martyr of martyrs, and the Lord
of lords." For this church two inscriptions were composed by Paulinus:
one, to accompany the painting with which he had adorned the apse; the other,
to announce that portions of the relics of the Apostle S. Andrew, of the
Evangelist S. Luke, and of S. Nazarius, and other martyrs, were deposited under
the altar. His verses may be thus rendered:
"In royal shrines, with purple marble
graced,
Their bones are under lighted altars
placed.
A holy band enshrined in one small
chest,
Full mighty names within its tiny
breast."
Prudentius visited not only the more
celebrated churches in Spain built over the bodies of the martyrs, he being a
Spaniard by birth, but he also visited those of Italy and Rome on a journey
made in 405. During his residence in the capital of Christianity, the poet
frequented the catacombs; and he has bequeathed to us a valuable record of what
he there saw. In his hymn in honor of S. Hippolytus, he tells us that he
visited the sepulchral chapel in which were deposited the remains of the martyr;
and, after having described the entrance into the cemetery, and the frescoes
that adorned it, he adds:
"In gloomy cave the martyr's
corpse is placed,
And there to God with sacred altars
graced,
To give the sacrament the board is
spread,
And zealous guard the holy martyr's
bed.
The bones are resting in this
hallowed tomb,
To wait th' eternal Judge's gracious
boon;
And there with holy food are
nourished those
Who call on Christ where tawny Tiber
flows."
In his
other hymns, Prudentius bears the mo unequivocal testimony to the practice,
even then a long time in use, of depositing the relics of the
Saints immediately under the altar. It is unnecessary to quote more. The
assertions of ancient writers on this point have been several times verified. The
bodies of the martyrs have been discovered under the high altars of the churches dedicated
to God in their memory. The body of S. Martina, together with those of
two other martyrs, SS. Concordens and Epiphanius, were found in 1624 under the
high altar of the ancient church near the Roman Forum, which bears the name of the Saint. The
body of S. Agnes, and that of another virgin martyr, were also ascertained
to be under the high altar of her church, denominated Fuori delle Mura. These,
however, had all been removed from the Catacombs into Rome, within
the walls.
Now
this fact being established, as well as that of the annual commemoration
of the Saint reposing in the church, it follows that it became necessary
for a Church to draw up calendars marking those days in the year which were consecrated to
the memory of martyrs whose relics were preserved in it; for
instance, in the Church of Fondi, which contained relics of S. Andrew, S. Luke, S.
Nazarius, and others, the Holy Eucharist would be celebrated over the relics
on the day of S. Andrew, on that of S. Luke, on that of S. Nazarius, and so on;
and it would be necessary for the Church to have a calendar of the days
thus set apart.
In the
first centuries of the Church, not only the Saints whose bodies reposed in the church, but also the dead of the
congregation were commemorated.
When a Roman Consul was elected, on
entering on his office he distributed among his friends certain presents,
called diptychs. These diptychs were folding tablets of ivory or boxwood,
sometimes of silver, connected together by hinges, so that they could be shut
or opened like a book. The exterior surface was richly carved, and generally
bore a portrait of the Consul who gave them away. Upon the inner surface was
written an epistle which accompanied the present, or a panegyric on himself.
They were reminders to friends, given much as a Christmas card is now sent. The
diptych speedily came into use in the Church. As the Consul on his elevation
sent one to his friends to remind them of his exaltation, so, on a death in the
congregation, a diptych was sent to the priest as a reminder of the dead who
desired the prayers of the faithful. At first, no doubt, there was a pack of
these little memorials, each bearing the name of the person who desired to be
remembered at the altar. But, for convenience, one double tablet was after a
while employed instead of a number, and all the names of those who were to be
commemorated were written in this book. From the ancient liturgies we gather
that it was the office of the deacon to rehearse aloud, to the people and the
priest, this catalogue registered in the public diptychs. In the
"Ecclesiastical Hierarchy", attributed to S. Dionysius the
Areopagite, but really of a later date, the end of the fifth century, the
author says of the ceremonies of the Eucharist, that after the kiss of peace:
"When all have reciprocally saluted one another, there is made the mystic recitation of the sacred
tablets." In the Liturgy of S. Mark we have this: "The
deacon reads the diptychs (or catalogue) of the dead. The priest
then bowing down prays: To the souls of all these, O Sovereign
Lord our God, grant repose in Thy holy tabernacle, in Thy kingdom, bestowing on
them the good things promised and prepared by Thee," etc.
It is
obvious that after a while the number of names continually swelling
would become too great to be recited at once. It became necessary,
therefore, to take some names on one day, others on another. And this originated the
Necrologium, or catalogue of the dead. The custom of reading the diptychs has
ceased to be observed in the Roman Liturgy, though we find it indicated there by
the Oratio supra Diptycha."
At
present, when the celebrating priest arrives at that part of the Canon called
the "Memento," he secretly commemorates those for whose souls he more
particularly wishes to pray. But, in addition to the diptychs of those for
whom the priest and congregation were desired to pray, there was the catalogue of the
Martyrs and Saints for whom the Church thanked God. For instance, in the
modern Roman Mass, in the Canon we have this commemoration: "Joining in
communion with, and reverencing, in the first place, the memory of the glorious
and evervirgin Mary, Mother of our God and Lord Jesus Christ; as also of Thy blessed
apostles and martyrs, Peter and Paul, Andrew, James, John, Thomas, James,
Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Simon and Thaddaeus; Linus, Cletus, Clement, Xystus, Cornelius, Cyprian, Laurence, Chrysogonus,
John and Paul, Cosmas and Damian, and of all Thy Saints," etc. This is
obviously a mere fragment of a commemoration of the Blessed Virgin, of the
apostles, and then of the special Roman martyrs. The catalogue of the Saints to
be remembered was long; there were hundreds of martyrs at Rome alone, and their
names were written down on sacred diptychs especially appropriated to this
purpose. Such an inscription was equivalent to the present ceremony of canonization.
The term canonization itself tells the history of the process. It is derived
from that part of the Mass called the Canon, in which occurs that memorial
already quoted. On the day when the Pope, after a scrutinizing examination into
the sanctity of a servant of God, formally inscribes him among the Saints, he
adds his name at the end of those already enumerated in the Canon, after "Cosmas
and Damian," and immediately reads Mass, adding this name at this place.
Formerly every bishop could and did canonize—that is, add the name of any local
Saint or martyr worthy of commemoration in his diocese.
When the list became long, it was
found impracticable to commemorate all nominatim at once, and the Saints were named on their special days. Thus, out of one set
of diptychs grew the Necrologium, and out of the other the Martyrology.
The Church took pains to collect and commit to writing the acts of the
martyrs. This is not to be wondered at; for the martyrs are the heroes of
Christianity, and as the world has her historians to record the achievements of the warriors who have gained renown in
conflict for power, so the Church had her officers to record the victories that
her sons won over the world and Satan. The Saints are the elect children of the
spouse of Christ, the precious fruit of her body; they are her crown of glory.
And when these dear children quit her to reap their eternal reward, the mother
retains precious memorials of them, and holds up their example to her other children
to encourage them to follow their glorious traces.
The first to institute an order of scribes to
take down the acts of the martyrs was S. Clement, the disciple of S. Peter, as
we are told by Pope S. Damasus, in the "Liber Pontificale." According
to this tradition, S. Clement appointed seven notaries, men of approved
character and learning, to collect in the city of Rome, each in his own region
of the city, the acts of the martyrs who suffered in it. To add to the
guarantee of good faith, Pope S. Fabian placed these seven notaries under the
control of the seven subdeacons, who with the seven deacons were placed over
the fourteen cardinal regions of the city of Rome.
Moreover, the Roman Pontiffs obtained the acts
of martyrs who had suffered in other churches. These acts were the process
verbal of their trial, with the names of the judges under whom they were
sentenced, and an account of the death endured. The acts of S. Philip of
Heraclea, SS. Hilary and Tatian, and SS. Peter, Paul, Andrew, and Dionysia, are
examples of such acts. Other acts were those written by
eyewitnesses, sometimes friends of the martyrs; those of the martyrs, SS. Perpetua,
Felicitas, and their companions are instances. The first part of these was
written by S. Perpetua herself, and reaches to the eve of her martyrdom; then
another confessor in the same prison took the pen and added to the eve of his
death, and the whole was concluded by an eyewitness of their passion. Other
acts again were written by those who, if not eye-witnesses, were able, from
being contemporaries and on the spot, to gather reliable information; such are
the narratives of the martyrs of Palestine by Eusebius, Bishop of Caesarea.
Unfortunately, comparatively few of the acts of the martyrs have come down to us
in their genuine freshness; and the Church of Rome, which set the example in
appointing notaries to record the facts, has been most careless about preserving
these records unadulterated; so that even the acts of some of her own bishops
and martyrs, S. Alexander, and S. Marcellinus, and S. Callixtus, are romances
devoid of all stamp of truth.
Tertullian says that on the natal
days, that is, on the days of martyrdom of the Saints who have suffered for
Christ: "We keep an annual commemoration." It is easy to see how this
usage necessitated the drawing up of lists in which were inscribed not only the
names of the martyrs, and the place of their decease, but also a few words
relative to their conflict, so that the people might associate their names with
their victories, and the names might not become, in time, to them empty sounds.
S. Cyprian was absent from Carthage when the persecution was raging there, but
he wrote to his clergy: "Note the days of their death, that we may
celebrate their commemorations along with the memorials of the martyrs." S.
Augustine says: "The Christian people celebrate the memory of the martyrs
with religious solemnity, both to excite to imitation, and that they may become
fellows in their merits and be assisted by their prayers."
Adrian I quotes the 13th Canon of
the African Church and the 47th of the third Carthaginian Council, in a letter
to Charlemagne, in which he says: "The Sacred Canons approved of the
passions of the Holy Martyrs being read in Church when their anniversary days
were being celebrated."
The names of the martyrs to be
commemorated were announced on the eve. By degrees other names besides those of
martyrs were introduced into the Martyrologies, as those of faithful servants
of God whose lives were deserving of imitation, but who had not suffered to the
death in testimony to the truth. Thus we have confessors, or those who endured
hardships for Christ, doctors, or teachers of the Church, virgins, widows,
bishops and abbots, and even penitents.
The Martyrologies may be divided
into two series, the ancient and the modern. We need only concern ourselves
with the Ancient Martyrologies.
The first to draw up a tolerably
full Martyrology was Eusebius the historian, Bishop of Caesarea in Palestine,
and he did this at the request of the Emperor Constantine. In this Martyrology
he noted all the martyrs of whom he had received an authentic account on the
days of their suffering, with the names of the judges who sentenced them, the
places where they suffered, and the nature of their sufferings. Eusebius wrote
about A.D. 320, but there were collections of the sort already extant, as we
may learn from the words of S. Cyprian already quoted, who in his instructions
to his clergy ordered them to compile what was practically a Martyrology of the
Carthaginian Church.
We have not got the Greek
Martyrology of Eusebius, but we have the Latin version made by S. Jerome. Bede
says of this, "Jerome was not the author, but the translator of this book;
Eusebius is said to have been the author."
But even this Latin version has not
come down to us in its original form. There are numerous copies, purporting to
be the Martyrology of S. Jerome, still extant, but hardly two of them agree.
The copies have been amplified. The occasion of S. Jerome making his
translation was as follows. At the Council of Milan, held in 39o, the presiding
Bishop, Gregory of Cordova, read out daily on the eve, as usual, the lists of
martyrs whose anniversary was to be celebrated on the morrow. As a good number
of those present knew nothing of the martyrs thus commemorated, they wrote by
the hands of Chromatius, Bishop of Aquileia, and Heliodorus, Bishop of Altino,
to S. Jerome, then at Bethlehem, to request him to draw up for their use a
Martyrology out of the collection made by Eusebius of Caesarea.
To this S. Jerome answered by
letter, stating that he had got the passions of the martyrs written by
Eusebius, and that he would gladly execute what was asked of him. With this
letter he sent the Martyrology, with the name of a martyr to every day in the
year except the first of January. Unfortunately, as already said, we have not
got a copy of the Martyrology unamended and unenlarged.
The "Martyrologium Romanum
Parvum," on which Ado of Vienne pretended to have based his Martyrology,
and which was published by Rosweydus, the learned Bollandist, in 1613, is now
entirely discredited. It was a forgery of Ado concocted before he became Bishop
of Vienne—but of this more presently.
Cassiodorus, in his "Institution
of Divine Lessons," says, "Read constantly the passions of the
martyrs, which among other places you will find in the letter of S. Jerome to
Chromatius and Heliodorus; they flourished over the whole earth, and provoked
to imitation; you will be led thereby to the heavenly kingdom."
The next Martyrology of any importance
to that of Jerome, is one composed by the Venerable Bede. In the catalogue of
his own works that he drew up, he says: "I wrote a Martyrology of the
natal days of the holy martyrs, in which I took care to set down all I could
find, not only on their several days, but I also gave the sort of conflict they
underwent, and under what judge they conquered the world."
If we
compare this Martyrology with the Acts of the Martyrs, we see at
once that Bede took his account from them verbatim, merely condensing the narrative. The Martyrology of Bede
was written about 720; Drepanius Florus, a priest of Lyons, who died
860, added to it considerably, and most of the copies of Bede's Martyrology that
we have are those enlarged by Florus.
The
next martyrologist is Ado, Bishop of Vienne, who has been already
mentioned in connection with the "Martyrologium Parvum." Ado was
born about the year 800, and died in 875. In his preface, Ado says: "For this work
of noting on their proper days the nativities of the Saints, which are
generally found confusedly in calendars, I have made use of a
venerable and very ancient Martyrology, at Aquileia, sent to a certain holy bishop by
the Roman Pontiff, and this was lent me, when at Ravenna, for a few days
by a certain religious brother. This I diligently copied, and thought to place it
at the head of my work. I have, however, inserted the passions of the
Saints somewhat longer in this Martyrology, for the use of the infirm brothers, and
those less able to get at books, that they may be able to read out of a little
book a compendium to the praise of God and the memory of the martyrs, instead of
overhauling a host of big volumes with much labor." The assertion
of Ado was false. It was a fraudulent assertion, as has been conclusively demonstrated
by Dom Quentin in "Les Martyrologes historiques," 1908.
S.
Gregory the Great, in his 29th Epistle, says: "We have the names of nearly all the martyrs with their passions set down
on their several days, collected into one volume, and we celebrate the Mass
daily in their honor." On this passage Ado pretended to base his work.
Actually, it was based on the Martyrology of Lyons, itself founded on that of
Bede.
The next martyrologist was Usuardus,
monk of Saint-Germain-des-Pres, who died in 876. He wrote his Martyrology at
the request of Charles the Bald, who was dissatisfied with the Martyrologies of
Jerome and of Bede because they were too short in their narratives, and also
because several days in the calendar were left blank. This account, which Usuardus
gives in his preface, does not tally with the words of the epistle attributed
to S. Jerome that precedes his Martyrology; and leads to the suspicion that
this portion of the epistle, at least, is not genuine. Usuardus certainly used
the Martyrologies of Ado and Florus as the basis of his work. This compilation
of Usuardus was so full, that it displaced the earlier Martyrologies in a great
many churches. The best edition of the Martyrology of Usuardus is that of
Solerius, Antwerp, 1714-1717. The modern Roman Martyrology is founded upon that
of Usuardus.
Usuardus was followed by Wandelbert,
monk or Prum, who died in 870. Wandelbert followed the Martyrologies of SS.
Jerome and Bede, as amplified by Florus, and wrote the notices of the martyrs
in hexameter Latin verses. This monument of patience is composed of about 360
metrical pieces, of which each contains the life of the Saint commemorated on
the day. To these, which form the bulk of the work, are prefixed others of less
importance, prefaces, dedicatory epistles to Lothair, preliminary discourses on
the importance of the Martyrology, on the knowledge of times and seasons,
months and days, etc. Although Wandelbert wrote for the most part in
hexameters, he abandoned them occasionally for lyric metres, which he managed
with less facility. D'Achéry published this Martyrology in his "Spicilegium,"
but the edition is a bad one.
There have been many later
Martyrologies, but these are of far inferior importance, and need not be here
enumerated. In the East, the Greeks had anciently their collections. That of
Eusebius probably formed the basis of later Menologies. In the Horology are
contained calendars of the Saints for every day with prayers; this portion of
the Horology is called the Menology.
The Menology is divided into months,
and contains the lives of the Saints, in abridgment, for each day, or the
simple commemoration of those whose acts are extant. The Menology of the Greeks
is, therefore, much the same as the Latin Martyrology, and there are almost as
many Menologies as there are Martyrologies. The principal is that of the
Emperor Basil II (d. 1025), published by Ughelli in his "Italia
Sacra." The larger Menologies are entitled "Synaxaria," because
they were read in the churches on days of assembly. These lives are very long,
and the Menology contains the substance in a condensed form.
The modern Roman Martyrology was
drawn up by order of Pope Gregory XIII, who appointed for the purpose eight
commissaries, amongst whom was Baronius. It leaves much to be desired, as it
bristles with inaccuracies. A fresh edition was issued with some corrections by
Benedict XIV. It demands a careful revision. Many of its inaccuracies have been
pointed out in the course of this work.
It is impossible to dismiss the
subject of Martyrologies without a word on the "Acta Sanctorum" of
the Bollandists. This magnificent collection of Lives of the Saints is arranged
on the principle of the Synaxarium, or Martyrology—that is to say, the Saints
are not given in their chronological order, but as they appear in the calendar.
Heribert Resweidus, of Utrecht, was
a learned Jesuit father, born in 1563, who died 1629. In 1607 he published the
"Fasti sanctorum quorum vitae
manuscriptae in Belgio," a book containing the plan of a vast work on
the lives of all the Saints, which he desired to undertake. In 1613 he
published "Notes on the old Roman Martyrology," which he was the
first to discover. In 1615 he brought out the "Lives of the Hermits,"
and in 1619 another work on the "Eremites of Palestine and Egypt." In
1626 he published the "Lives of the Virgin Saints." He died before
the great work for which he had collected, and to which he had devoted his time
and thoughts, was begun. But the project was not allowed to drop. It was taken
up by John Bollandus, another Jesuit; with him were associated two other
fathers of the same order, Henschenius and Papebrock, and in 1643 appeared the
January volumes, two in number. In 1648 the three volumes of the February
Saints issued from the press. Bollandus died in 1665, and the March volumes,
three in number, edited by Henschenius and Papebrock, appeared in 1668. As the
work proceeded, material came in in abundance, and the work grew under their
hands. May was represented by seven volumes; so also June, July, and August.
The compilation is not yet complete. But a large store of material has been
accumulated, that serves for the remaining volumes, and which is also poured
forth in the quarterly issues of the "Annalecta Bollandiana," of
which thirty-two volumes have been issued up to the end of 1913. Naturally, the
earlier volumes of the "Acta Sanctorum" are very incomplete, and
deserve to be entirely recast and to be greatly amplified.
The principle on which the
Bollandists have worked is an excellent one. They have not themselves written
the lives of the Saints, but they publish every scrap of record, and all the
ancient acts and lives of the Saints that are extant. The work is a storehouse
of historical materials. To these materials the editors prefix an introductory
essay on the value and genuineness of the material, and on the chronology of
the Saint's life. They have done their work conscientiously and well. Only
occasionally have they omitted acts or portions of lives which they have
regarded as mythical or unedifying. These omissions are to be regretted, as
they would have been instructive.
Another valuable repository of the
lives of Saints is Mabillon's "Collection of the Acts of the Saints of the
Order of S. Benedict," in nine volumes, published 1668-1701. The arrangement
in this collection is by centuries. Theodoric Ruinart, in 1689, published the Acts
of the Martyrs, but not a complete series; he selected only those which he
regarded as genuine.
With regard to England, there is a
Martyrology of Christ Church, Canterbury, written in the thirteenth century,
and now in the British Museum (Arundell MSS., No. 68); also a Martyrology
written between 1220 and 1224, from the south-west of England; this also is in
the British Museum (MSS. Reg. 2, A. xiii.). A Saxon Martyrology, incomplete, is
among the Harleian MSS. (2785) in the same museum. It dates from the fourteenth
century. There is a transcript among the Sloane MSS. (4938), of a Martyrology
of North English origin, but this also is incomplete. There are others, later,
of less value. The most interesting is "The Martiloge in Englysshe, after
the use of the chirche of Salisbury," printed by Wynkyn de Worde in 1526,
reissued by the "Henry Bradshaw Society " in 1893. To these Martyrologies
must be added the "Legenda" of John of Tynemouth, A.D. 1350; that of
Capgrave, A.D. 1450, his "Nova Legenda," printed in 1516, and recently
edited by Horstmann, 1901; Whit-ford's "Martyrology," 1526, reprinted
by the Henry Bradshaw Society, 1891; Wilson's "Martyrologue," 1st
edition, 1608, 2nd edition, 1640; and Bishop Challoner's "Memorial of
Ancient British Piety," 1761. Recently the Rev. Richard Stanton, Priest of
the Oratory, London, has issued an invaluable " Martyrology of England
and Wales," 1887.
Scottish Kalendars have been reprinted
and commented on, and brief lives of the Saints given by the late Bishop Forbes
of Brechin, in " Kalendars of Scottish Saints," Edinburgh, 1872.
The
Welsh and Cornish Saints have been taken in hand by the Author and
the Rev. John Fisher, B.D., and their Lives have been published in four
volumes by the Cymmrodorion Society.
May
1914.
S.
BARING-GOULD.
