FRANCIS I AGAIN DEFEATED IN ITALY
The
princes of the league of Smalkalde, filled with resentment and indignation at
the cruelty with which their brethren were treated, could not conceive Francis
to be sincere, when he offered to protect in Germany those very tenets, which he
persecuted with such rigor in his own dominions; so that all Bellay’s art and
eloquence in vindicating his master, or apologizing for his conduct, made but
little impression upon them. They considered likewise, that the emperor, who
hitherto had never employed violence against the doctrines of the reformers,
nor even given them much molestation in their progress, was now bound by the
agreement at Ratisbon, not to disturb such as had embraced the new opinions;
and the Protestants wisely regarded this as a more certain and immediate
security, than the precarious and distant hopes with which Francis endeavored
to allure them. Besides, the manner in which he had behaved to his allies at
the peace of Cambray, was too recent to be forgotten, and did not encourage
others to rely much on his friendship or generosity. Upon all these accounts,
the protestant princes refused to assist the French king in any hostile attempt
against the emperor. The elector of Saxony, the most zealous among them, in
order to avoid giving any umbrage to Charles, would not permit Melanchthon to
visit the court of France, although that reformer, flattered perhaps by the
invitation of so great a monarch, or hoping that his presence there might be of
signal advantage to the protestant cause, discovered a strong inclination to
undertake the journey.
But
though none of the many princes who envied or dreaded the power of Charles,
would second Francis’s efforts in order to reduce and circumscribe it, he,
nevertheless, commanded his army to advance towards the frontiers of Italy. As
his sole pretext for taking arms was that he might chastise the duke of Milan
for his insolent and cruel breach of the law of nations, it might have been
expected that the whole weight of his vengeance was to have fallen on his
territories. But on a sudden, and at their very commencement, the operations of
war took another direction.
Charles duke of Savoy, one of the least active and
able princes of the line from which he descended, had married Beatrix of
Portugal, the sister of the empress. By her great talents, she soon acquired an
absolute ascendant over her husband; and proud of her affinity to the emperor,
or allured by the magnificent promises with which he flattered her ambition,
she formed a union between the duke and the Imperial court, extremely
inconsistent with that neutrality which wise policy as well as the situation of
his dominions had hitherto induced him to observe in all the quarrels between
the contending monarchs.
Francis was abundantly sensible of the distress to
which he might be exposed, if, when he entered Italy, he should leave behind
him the territories of a prince, devoted so obsequiously to the emperor, that
he had sent his eldest son to be educated in the court of Spain, as a kind of
hostage for his fidelity. Clement the Seventh, who had represented this danger
in a strong light during his interview with Francis at Marseilles, suggested to
him, at the same time, the proper method of guarding against it, having advised
him to begin his operations against the Milanese, by taking possession of Savoy
and Piedmont, as the only certain way of securing a communication with his own
dominions.
Francis, highly irritated at the duke on many accounts, particularly
for having supplied the constable Bourbon with the money that enabled him to
levy the body of troops which ruined the French army in the fatal battle of
Pavia, was not unwilling to let him now feel both how deeply he resented, and
how severely he could punish these injuries. Nor did he want several pretexts
which gave some color of equity to the violence he intended. The territories of
France and Savoy lying contiguous to each other, and intermingled in many
places, various disputes, unavoidable in such a situation, subsisted between
the two sovereigns concerning the limits of their respective property; and
besides, Francis, in right of his mother, Louise of Savoy, had large claims
upon the duke her brother, for her share in their father's succession.
Being
unwilling, however, to begin hostilities without some cause of quarrel more
specious than these pretensions, many of which were obsolete, and others
dubious, he demanded permission to march through Piedmont in his way to the
Milanese, hoping that the duke, from an excess of attachment to the Imperial
interest, might refuse this request, and thus give a greater appearance of
justice to all his operations against him. But, if we may believe the historians
of Savoy, who appear to be better informed with regard to this particular than
those of France, the duke readily, and with a good grace, granted what it was
not in his power to deny, promising free passage to the French troops as was
desired; so that Francis, as the only method now left of justifying the
measures which he determined to take, was obliged to insist for full satisfaction
with regard to everything that either the crown of France or his mother Louise
could demand of the house of Savoy. Such an evasive answer, as might have been
expected, being made to this requisition, the French army under the admiral
Brion poured at once into the duke’s territories at different places. The
countries of Bresse and Bugey, united at that time to Savoy, were overrun in a
moment. Most of the towns in the duchy of Savoy opened their gates at the
approach of the enemy; a few which attempted to make resistance were easily
taken; and before the end of the campaign the duke saw himself stripped of all
his dominions, but the province of Piedmont, in which there were not many
places in a condition to be defended.
To
complete the duke’s misfortunes, the city of Geneva, the sovereignty of which
he claimed, and in some degree possessed, threw off his yoke, and its revolt
drew along with it the loss of the adjacent territories.
Geneva was, at that
time, an Imperial city, and though under the direct dominion of its own
bishops, and the remote sovereignty of the dukes of Savoy, the form of its
internal constitution was purely republican, being governed by syndics and a
council chosen by the citizens. From these distinct and often clashing
jurisdictions, two opposite parties took their rise, and had long subsisted in
the state; the one, composed of the advocates for the privileges of the
community, assumed the name of Eignotz,
or confederates in defence of liberty; and branded the other, which supported
the episcopal or ducal prerogatives, with the name of Mammelukes, or slaves. At length [1532], the protestant opinions
beginning to spread among the citizens, inspired such as embraced them with
that bold enterprising spirit which always accompanied or was naturally
produced by them in their first operations. As both the duke and bishop were
from interest, from prejudice, and from political considerations, violent
enemies of the reformation, all the new converts joined with warmth the party
of the Eignotz; and zeal for
religion, mingling with the love of liberty, added strength to that generous
passion. The rage and animosity of two factions, shut up within the same walls,
occasioned frequent insurrections, which terminating mostly to the advantage of
the friends of liberty, they daily became more powerful.
The
duke and bishop, forgetting their ancient contests about jurisdiction, had
united against their common enemies, and each attacked them with his proper
weapons. The bishop excommunicated the people of Geneva as guilty of a double
crime; of impiety, in apostatizing from the established religion; and of
sacrilege, in invading the rights of his see. The duke attacked them as rebels
against their lawful prince, and attempted to render himself master of the
city, first by surprise, and then by open force [1534]. The citizens, despising
the thunder of the bishop’s censures, boldly asserted their independence
against the duke; and partly by their valor, partly by the powerful assistance
which they received from the canton of Berne; together with some small supplies
both of men and money, secretly furnished by the king of France, they defeated
all his attempts.
Not satisfied with having repulsed him, or with remaining
always upon the defensive themselves, they now took advantage of the duke’s
inability to resist them, while overwhelmed by the armies of France, and seized
several castles and places of strength which he possessed in the neighborhood
of Geneva: thus delivering the city from those odious monuments of its former
subjection, and rendering the public liberty more secure for the future. At the
same time the canton of Berne invaded and conquered the Pays de Vaud, to which
it had some pretensions. The canton of Freiburg, though zealously attached to
the catholic religion, and having no subject of contest with the duke, laid
hold on part of the spoils of that unfortunate prince. A great portion of these
conquests or usurpations being still retained by the two cantons, add considerably
to their power, and have become the most valuable part of their territories.
Geneva, notwithstanding many schemes and enterprises of the dukes of Savoy to
reestablish their dominion over it, still keeps possession of its independence;
and in consequence of that blessing, has attained a degree of consideration,
wealth, and elegance, which it could not otherwise have reached.
Amidst
such a succession of disastrous events, the duke of Savoy had no other resource
but the emperor’s protection, which, upon his return from Tunis, he demanded with
the most earnest importunity; and as his misfortunes were occasioned chiefly by
his attachment to the Imperial interest, he had a just title to immediate
assistance. Charles, however, was not in a condition to support him with that
vigour and dispatch which the exigency of his affairs called for. Most of the
troops employed in the African expedition, having been raised for that service
alone, were disbanded as soon as it was finished; the veteran forces under
Antonio de Leyva were hardly sufficient for the defence of the Milanese; and
the emperor's treasury was entirely drained by his extraordinary efforts
against the Infidels.
But
the death of Francis Sforza [Oct. 24], occasioned, according to some
historians, by the terror of a French invasion, which had twice been fatal to
his family, afforded the emperor full leisure to prepare for action.